Toast

34 comments on “Toast ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Anita 1

   12 July 2009 at 4:32 pm

   Why didn’t Holmes as Wilkinson the very simple question “If you don’t like it, and it will take three months to review, why didn’t you ask for the review at the May meeting?”
2. torydog 2

   12 July 2009 at 5:14 pm

   It was cringe making……i almost felt sorry for her (got over that) and was simply horrified at how dreadful she came across…dah dah dah!!!!

   This is what NZ voted for….tragic!!!!!!!
3. Outofbed 3

   12 July 2009 at 5:28 pm

   It seems obvious that Sue K would be a much better Food safety Minister
   • George D 3.1

     12 July 2009 at 11:35 pm

     If that’s obvious, then things must be bad!
4. ghostwhowalks 4

   12 July 2009 at 5:32 pm

   8 months after an election an yet again a National minister is found out of her depth in a shallow pool
5. Murray 5

   12 July 2009 at 5:39 pm

   Wasn’t this regulation introduced by labour?
   To constantly slag off the messengers for their inexperience in interviews is somewhat stupid and pointless.
   Some in National are still finding their feet in a New Government.
   However their relaxed style is still more effective then the carefully structured and controlled interviews given by HC
   And the bland and sometimes hysterical utterances of Phil Goff.
   • Anita 5.1

     12 July 2009 at 5:45 pm

     Yep, one of the many things srcewed up by the last Labour led government.

     And yep, one of the many things that National could have fixed rather than flailing about. Wilkinson could have dealt with this months ago and we wouldn’t be in this ridiculous position.
     • the sprout 5.1.1

       12 July 2009 at 5:59 pm

       exactly.
       people are already well over the ‘blame labour defence’.
6. Rex Widerstrom 6

   12 July 2009 at 5:51 pm

   Nice subliminal messaging in the pic there, sprout.

   Indeed if they don’t improve their performance, they will be toast.
   • the sprout 6.1

     12 July 2009 at 5:57 pm

     thanks Rex 😉
7. torydog 7

   12 July 2009 at 6:30 pm

   if after 7 months they are still finding their feet i’d suggest they need to be replaced by someone competent…..but, hey, the tories dont like competent, i mean look at their last 4 leaders!!!!!

   There seems to be a mass drugging of the population at the moment…or at least the ones who get polled are on something, as I will never understand how the nats can still be flying high………seriously strange!!!!!!
   • Anita 7.1

     12 July 2009 at 6:36 pm

     I reckon that polls don’t swing until the next election is actually on the horizon. For most people if they’re rung while trying to eat dinner/watch a tv show/bath the children and asked who they’d vote for the answer will be same-as-last-time.

     Firstly, why would most people waste time thinking about it? Secondly, to swing so early is to admit to having been wrong, to swing at 2 years 6 months is to be a good democratic citizen paying attention.
   • Murray 7.2

     12 July 2009 at 6:40 pm

     I guess people are so seriously relieved to have dumped that obscenity that is labour
     • r0b 7.2.1

       12 July 2009 at 6:42 pm

       We love you too Murray.
8. infused 8

   12 July 2009 at 6:50 pm

   I must say, I will be no longer buying bread once this law comes in to effect. Be it Labour or National, this whole thing is retarded. Mass medicate the whole of New Zealand to save what, one or two people are year?

   Why not target the people at risk. Talk about a lazy way to fix a problem.

   I’ve been wanting to make my own bread for along time, this is a good excuse 🙂
   • Anita 8.1

     12 July 2009 at 6:55 pm

     Targeting women who aren’t intending to become pregnant but do anyway is notoriously difficult.

     (Not that I support mass medication, but your solution to 10-15 babies born with spina bifida a year (plus about the same number of late terminations) is not actually a solution)
   • r0b 8.2

     12 July 2009 at 7:02 pm

     Better stop drinking water too infused. It’s probably fluoridated.

     Oh – and mind out for the iodine in salt.
     • infused 8.2.1

       13 July 2009 at 7:59 am

       I don’t drink tap water or eat salt. Thanks for the concern though 😉 Water from Petone for the win.

       Despite what people think, you don’t need salt in food.
       • Maynard J 8.2.1.1

         13 July 2009 at 11:59 am

         If you make your own bread you will most likely end up doing it differently from mass production methods, so the natural folate will remain in your bread.

         This regulation merely replaced the folate artificially taken out during the processing of mass-baked bread.

         But hey, it will be folate, not folic acid. Let me know if you really notice the difference.
   • Draco T Bastard 8.3

     12 July 2009 at 7:43 pm

     It’s not really a mass medication but a mass dietary supplement. We need folic acid in our food and we just aren’t getting enough. This seems like a reasonable way to do so. The other alternatives is to persuade everyone to change their diet or we could do nothing and keep getting stung by the extra costs brought about by vitamin deficiency.
     • Anita 8.3.1

       12 July 2009 at 7:48 pm

       Draco T Bastard,

       We need folic acid in our food and we just aren’t getting enough. This seems like a reasonable way to do so.

       I’m getting enough. Why should the government require me to take a dietary supplement, let alone one that I don’t need?
       • ak 8.3.1.1

         12 July 2009 at 9:07 pm

         I’m getting enough.

         Skite.

         Why should the government require me to…

         Compulsory crust consumption? Holy doughnuts ‘nita – the NACTORIs have always been more than happy to let people eat cake. (prefer sprouts meself: blogalicious)
         • the sprout 8.3.1.1.1

           12 July 2009 at 11:49 pm

           yurg!
       • Ari 8.3.1.2

         12 July 2009 at 9:43 pm

         Let alone one that there is suspicion could actually be bad for you.
9. felix 9

   12 July 2009 at 9:57 pm

   I agree with Anita (and others), this whole approach is crazy. I’d also add that we probably don’t need to be encouraging the consumption of more highly refined flour products.

   r0b, iodine isn’t a compulsory addition to salt.

   infused, good luck with the breadmaking, it can be very satisfying and delicious. Don’t expect to save yourself any coin though, economies of scale and all that.
   • infused 9.1

     13 July 2009 at 8:02 am

     Oh I know… it looks more expensive. My grandad use to make bread when I was a kid. I always remember how yummy it was. I think that’s because he added beer to it. lol.
10. BLiP 10

    12 July 2009 at 11:18 pm

    Where’s the screaming indignation from the rabid right about freedom of choice in what we eat – or does that freedom apply only in relation to feeding coca-cola and pies to school children?
11. Oscar 11

    12 July 2009 at 11:40 pm

    What was missing from this and the TV1 news report was some balance and context.

    I always new there was a reason why I didn’t like silver beet it causes cancer!
12. gobsmacked 12

    13 July 2009 at 1:17 pm

    On ‘Breakfast’ today, Key was as feeble on this as Wilkinson yesterday.

    They’d better not add folic acid to fudge. Or waffles. Key would overdose.
13. Oliver 13

    13 July 2009 at 6:47 pm

    From what I read of your blog piece you’re criticising Wilkinson for failing to defend an indefensible decision made by a Labour Cabinet Minister.
14. Daff 14

    14 July 2009 at 11:00 am

    the folic thing sounds like packing candies into water tight “condoms”.The funny thing is many smaller children have trouble opening them.
15. Brian Barry 15

    14 July 2009 at 11:04 am

    If we accept this potion in our bread, what will they do next?

Links to post

1. Loo Soo Ling: posted on 12 July 2009 at 8:38 am
2. Folic acid fiasco at The Standard: posted on 14 July 2009 at 2:01 pm

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS