One true lesson about the Tony Veitch affair

Written By: - Date published: 7:32 pm, July 13th, 2008 - 57 comments
Categories: Media - Tags:

It seems that everyone’s commenting right now on Tony Veitch. The various slants by the different commentators, on the same sordid matter seem largely to come down to which ‘camp’ you started from, although not exclusively I presume that Mathew Ridge regarded Veitch as a mate before the saga emerged.

There are of course those who are outraged, and rightly so. But then there are the apologists those who readily point to Veitch’s contrition and celebrity status as being a factor for sympathy.

Michelle Boag is one such person, as seen on Close-up last week. As a former National Party president and Public Relations practitioner, Michelle reckons it’ll blow over fairly quickly for Veitch and New Zealanders will forgive when someone expresses regret, as Veitch has done.

Here’s a little question for Michelle and those who have rushed to his defense. Are these not the same people who often talk about Law & Order in the terms of the inappropriately named ‘Sensible Sentencing Trust’ ‘violent offenders should be locked up and the key thrown away’?

Oh yes, we live in a world of double-standards. I suspect that ‘Law & Order’ issues, as ranted about by the likes of Michelle Boag and the National Party should only apply to non-celebrity types. That’s why Tony Veitch will be given every opportunity to rehabilitate himself by people like Michelle Boag and her ilk without ever seeing the inside of a prison.

Of course it can never be the same for those who can’t afford the good advice of Michelle Boag and who have to face our justice system.

See also the Spare Room comment.

57 comments on “One true lesson about the Tony Veitch affair ”

  1. Anita 1

    To echo Maia for a moment, why is The Standard treating domestic violence as a primarily party-political issue?

    [lprent: The Standard is a program running on a machine. Address it to a human]

  2. Anita 2

    To echo Maia for a moment, why is The Standard treating domestic violence as a primarily party-political issue?

    This issue is about a woman who was beaten by the man she loved, it is about a man who beat a woman, it is about the domestic violence in our community, it is about the changes we all have to make to create safe homes for all New Zealanders.

    Seeing it as no more than a political opportunity is revolting, it shows a lack of care and respect for every woman, child and man who has experienced domestic violence.

    Bah!

  3. What bollocks Anita. ‘Life’ itself is about political debate. If you cared about respect for every woman, child and man, you should enter into the political discussion without going into The Standard (a political debate website) to plead that it shouldn’t be discussed. Have a chat to Womens’ Refuges about whether violence is a political issue worthy of debate?

  4. Anita 4

    Domestic violence is a political issue worth starting a debate about.

    You did not, however, do that. You attacked Michelle Boag, the National Party and, to some extent, the Sensible Sentencing Trust.

    It is disturbing to know that when a woman’s back has been broken and details of her personal life spread across the media, what you see is an opportunity to attack the ex-president of the National Party.

    There is so much room in this discussion for real political debate, for trying to make things better; but instead you chose point-scoring.

    (Ok, I’m going to make a nice cup of tea and try not to get myself banned)

  5. Dean 5

    “What bollocks Anita. ‘Life’ itself is about political debate. If you cared about respect for every woman, child and man, you should enter into the political discussion without going into The Standard (a political debate website) to plead that it shouldn’t be discussed. Have a chat to Womens’ Refuges about whether violence is a political issue worthy of debate?”

    Mmmhmm. And how about that Labour activitist who smashed someone with a megaphone in front of a camera?

    Of course, you like his politics, so let’s just move along and pretend there’s nothing to see here.

    It amazes me how much people like you will spin the hell out of any issue when the polls are down. As Anita said, bah.

    captcha: “Good salesman”. How terribly bloody fitting.

  6. Anita’s got a point. But on the other hand, I am just plain disgusted to hear about Boag’s utterly cynical response. Thanks for pointing this out ZK.

    Looking at the blogs, I’ve noticed that many of those who would normally come down very heavily on lawn order have been tempted to make excuses. Yes, they do tend to be right-wing. That said, there are some honourable Ridge-like exceptions amongst the right-wing blogs.

    And what does the Sensible Sentencing Trust have to say on such a high profile case? Their silence is deafening.

    Apparently the key message is too subtle for these people, but I’ll try again… Once you start making excuses, such as ‘he’s paid up’, then IT IS OKAY. And that’s very wrong.

  7. Blar 7

    You’re a fucking slimeball.

    Saying that is worth the ban/warning I might get.

    [lprent: probably I would if I could figure out who you were talking to or what about. I don’t ban unless I cannot see sufficient provocation]

  8. Let’s get something quite clear. Yes political debate is about political points-scoring, but it’s also about actually having the debate so that we might all learn from each other’s views. When Michelle Boag, representing a ‘firm’ National Party line on violence, comes out in sympathy for someone who has caused considerable damage to his former partner, why shouldn’t that be debated here?

    How would Anita like it to be debated? Should it be without mentioning Michelle Boag and National’s attitude to violent criminals? Perhaps she doesn’t think that Tony Veitch is such a person?

    Let me comment on somethig else – “Labour activitist who smashed someone with a megaphone in front of a camera.”

    For all I know Tony Veitch might even vote Labour, although I hope not. To take a completely non-party line, I suspect that the problem of domestic violence is not drawn along political affiliantion lines. But I’m damned if Michelle Boag can decide who is a criminal and who is not.

  9. Lew 9

    I think y’all are missing Anita’s point to an extent.

    The worst thing about this issue with Tony Veitch, last year’s issue with Sitiveni Sivivatu, and (insert list of other such cases) is that the matter is framed as the (possible) end of a man’s career, whereas the issue of public good is the harm inflicted by a man on a woman and by extension the throughgoing nature of domestic violence in NZ.

    Who cares about his career? What of the victim?

    L

  10. Blar 10

    To clarify Lynn, I was talking to Z K Muggletonspofin. I called him/her a fucking slimeball because this is a genuinely reprehensible post that follows the following logic:

    Michelle Boag is a member of the National party. She was invited on to a program to give her independent opinion as a well known PR consultant – this was a view sought by TVNZ, not offered by Boag because they felt a comment from a PR professional was of interest to viewers.

    The professional view she expressed was that Veitch could survive this. This view was founded on the assumption that Veitch wouldn’t be charged – at no point did Boag say she thinks he should charged because it is frankly down to his ex-partner to press charges.

    You have extrapolated from this that Boag is secretly a proponent of domestic violence for the rich. You have extrapolated from this is the view of the National party because it was expressed by someone who was, until they were ignomoniously booted out, an office holder in the organisational wing of the National party, a role that was as you would have guessed, purely administrative and had nothing to do with the formation or implementation of policy.

    You have then said this strawman view conflicts with the Sensible Sentencing Trust who you have labelled another front for what seems to be an increasingly multifarious National Party ergo the National party are wife-beating hypocrites.

    You’ve set up two massive straw men and attempted to use them to attack National. It’s disgusting and highly ineffective politicking, the sort we haven’t seen around the place since the early days of Sleep-on-politics.

    It would be on par with me saying the Labour party is run by the Moonies because Peter Tapsell is a former Labour MP or that everyone in the Labour party trawls for rough trade because Colin Moyle sniffed around the wrong places about 30 years ago.

    So just to clarify, the author of this post – Z K whatever – is a fucking slimeball.

  11. Anita 11

    ZKM,

    A quick list, what could/should a left leaning political blog say about the whole Veitch issue

    1) Talk about how the crime-and-punishment pressure groups at the moment have put additional pressure on the victims of domestic violence; how they make it both harder to report and harder if they don’t report, how their narrow focus on a particular type of violent crime makes it harder for victims of other types.

    2) Talk about how the focus of the discussion has been about Veitch, and his victim has been either blamed, overlooked or revictimised. What are the forces that mean we focus on the more powerful and ignore the weaker.

    3) Discuss the causes of domestic violence, how they apply to to Veitch, how they apply to other members of society, what that tells us about NZ as a society and how we could change it.

    4) Talk about what recent governments have done about domestic violence, how successful it has been, and whether it would be carried on by other parties.

    5) Discuss section 59 repeal, how has this influenced our attitudes to domestic violence. Are the organisations fighting for the right of parents to smack children also more accepting of husbands smacking wives?

    6) Talk about what the different political and legislative approaches to resolving the issue could be.

    7) Talk about the attempts the current government has made to identify why victims of domestic violence don’t come forward, what they’re doing about it, and how other parties have reacted.

    8 ) Talk about the risks around SOEs, COCs and other quasi-government organisations in shaping and modelling who we want NZ to be (a stretch but an interesting one, and one which stretches to privatisation).

  12. Anita 12

    ZKM,

    Better still, what could/should a Labour movement blog talk about

    1) It interests me that Veitch partly blames working two jobs – what does this say about an economic and labour environment which forces so many people to work two jobs?

    2) His victim is said to have lost her job because of his violence toward her. How should employers, unions and colleagues support victims of domestic violence?

    3) How many of the people who support the victims of domestic violence either volunteers or very poorly paid? Why are the people who investigate, prosecute and defend perpetrators of domestic violence so much better paid? What does this say about the way we value labour and skills?

  13. Dean 13

    “Let me comment on somethig else – “Labour activitist who smashed someone with a megaphone in front of a camera.’

    For all I know Tony Veitch might even vote Labour, although I hope not. To take a completely non-party line, I suspect that the problem of domestic violence is not drawn along political affiliantion lines. But I’m damned if Michelle Boag can decide who is a criminal and who is not.”

    To take a completely non-party line would be fine, but in the very same paragrapgh you are still trying to take a party line. You just cannot help yourself, can you. You attempted to politicise this event by linking it to something a former National president said recently, and it’s backfired on you spectacularly.

    You can attempt to illustrate the hypocrisy of National and the sensible sentancing trust all you like – and theres plenty of ammunition to go on there, I agree – but this wasn’t your motive with this post, and it’s obvious to everybody.

    Sorry, ZK, but if you’re going to post like this then you’re going to have to expect to be called on it for what it is – ridiculous grandstanding.

  14. Blar, “… ergo the National party are wife-beating hypocrites.”

    Don’t see this anywhere in ZK’s post, but at least you provided a detailed argument this time.

    To address Boag’s points, I don’t think kiwis will forgive quite so quickly. For one thing, the idea of someone buying their way out of the justice system just because they are wealthy doesn’t sit well with traditional kiwi values.

    Clearly someone with the same so-called “professional” expertise is advising TVNZ management, because they seem to think that they can hide Veitch for a few months and then rehabilitate him. Can’t see it working, but I guess time will tell.

    Captcha: manager polls

  15. CMR 15

    There are two crimes here:

    1 That the thug could assault his partner.

    2 That the thug believed, at least ostensibly, that he could buy his way out of the criminal code.

    In essence I agree with Anita except for “…the changes we all have to make to create safe homes for all New Zealanders.” Sorry, but I and my family already live in a safe home in NZ. What additional changes do you require of me? If you can answer this I’ll endeavour to live up to your inchoate expectations.

  16. Blar 16

    JP – “I suspect that ‘Law & Order’ issues, as ranted about by the likes of Michelle Boag and the National Party should only apply to non-celebrity types”

    Seems to imply that the National party is down with wife-beating.

  17. Anita 17

    lprent,

    [lprent: The Standard is a program running on a machine. Address it to a human]

    The front page contains the analogy between The Standard and a newspaper. We can cheerfully say “The Herald seems to be very anti-Labour at the moment”, what is different about saying “The Standard is using an example of domestic violence for political point scoring”?

  18. Anita 18

    CMR,

    What additional changes do you require of me? If you can answer this I’ll endeavour to live up to your inchoate expectations.

    For a start, every single time you hear or read someone saying anything explicitly or implicitly blaming a victim of domestic violence or rape, pull them up on it. Every single time.

    I am so envious, I never get to use “inchoate”! 🙂

  19. Blar 19

    “Clearly someone with the same so-called ?professional? expertise is advising TVNZ management”

    The Head of Corporate Affairs – whose brief involves dealing with the media – Peter Parussini could have his role in this looked at. If I was in to partisan politics I woild point out he is a former Labour party press secretary and political candidate. But I’m not, so yeah.

  20. Anita, About your 9.07 list. Do draft such a post and send it to me at jafapete@hotmail.co.uk and I’ll happily post it. Cheers Peter

  21. I was a bit surprised at Michelle Boag believing the fuss will die down and Veitch will be able to sneak back into work.
    But she was offering that view as Michalle Boag, PR woman, not Michelle Boag, representative of the National Party.
    I think you will find people on the right as disgusted with Tony Veitch as those on the left.
    Certainly the little shortarse has had much condemnation from myself and Adolf at No Minister, Whale Oil, Keeping Stock and Kiwiblog,etc.
    You are clutching at straws to make a political statement from Veitch.
    What is more concerning for me and others was the focus the media gave to Tony Veitch when there are more pressing issues like Winston Peters, the economy, John Key, etc, etc.

  22. lprent 22

    We can cheerfully say “The Herald seems to be very anti-Labour at the moment’, what is different about saying “The Standard is using an example of domestic violence for political point scoring’?

    The difference is editorial control. Each poster is capable of putting their posts up without having anyone else looking at them and often do so. (which is why ZKM managed to put their post up as a page earlier).

    It is a multi-author blog site without editorial control. Therefore to talk about “The Standard” is to talk about a level of authority and responsibility that doesn’t exist. The Herald on the other hand has that collective responsibility. The eventual legal implications get interesting.

    Where we do cooperate is on the moderation and even there the guidelines are pretty damn loose and subject to individual interpretation. That is a common interest in making sure that comments section doesn’t get overrun by raving flamewars.

    That is why there isn’t “The Standard” as a entity with an opinion. It is a site.

  23. Tane 23

    Anita. As Lynn said, “The Standard” isn’t saying anything about the issue – individual posters write in their own individual capacities.

    I haven’t written anything on Veitch yet, and I probably won’t. One reason is because I hardly have time to write anything these days, another is that all that needed to be said has already been said in my opinion.

    Personally I don’t think there’s much to be gained by trying to tar any political party with the Veitch fiasco, and it’d be a far better use of my fellow posters’ time to divert their energy somewhere else. But contrary to the conspiracy theories of some of our right-wing friends, there is no editorial control or direction on this site, and no collective check on what anyone writes. Sometimes that’s a strength, sometimes it’s a weakness.

    I see you’ve already had an offer from JP, but if there’s a perspective you feel should be expressed here that is currently lacking then feel free to write us a guest post. We’re all about the diversity of opinions.

  24. Oliver 24

    Having looked over what Boag said she didn’t endorse Veitch’s actions, she didn’t say that it’s okay for him to beat his partner, she simply said that she expects it to blow over. If I walk outside on a cloudy day and say that I expect it to rain that doesn’t mean that I want it to rain or that I endorse rain.

  25. If you’re a pretty pill popping, smart mouthed boy from the rip off TVNZ club, you don’t have to worry about the DV Act like other people !!!!!

    I have experienced seven years of shear hell built around false allegations of psychological and emotional abuse, and this wee prick gets away with vicious violent crap like this ? No wonder I am bitter !!!!!!! Stuff the two faced system. Who said it wasn’t US and THEM in New Zealand , the land of the looooooooooooooooooooong black lie !

  26. andy 26

    Have we reached “Peak Veitch”?

    Leave it to the Police, they know both sides of the story.

  27. Craig Ranapia 27

    Anita. As Lynn said, “The Standard’ isn’t saying anything about the issue – individual posters write in their own individual capacities.

    Oh come on, Tane, what a bloody cop-out. That’s like saying the Herald on Sunday isn’t “saying” anything by it’s decision to run a truly vile puff-piece interview under Paul Holmes’ by-line yesterday. Are there any editorial standards in play here, at all?

  28. Tane 28

    Craig, read higher up the thread. The HoS has centralised editorial control. The Standard doesn’t. I wasn’t a fan of ZKM’s post, but then I’m sure he’s not a fan of some of mine. That’s what a diversity of voices is about.

  29. Blar 29

    Anita. As Lynn said, “The Standard’ isn’t saying anything about the issue – individual posters write in their own individual capacities.

    Someone has to be responsible for allowing a tard like this to post. You guys have previously said you wouldn’t have Robinsod as a poster and I highly doubt you would accept my application to post. So who let this tard post?

    [lprent: Try this http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?author=10
    ZKM has had writer privileges for a long time and even if you dislike his opinions, does write posts that read well, have opinions, points and arguments that provoke discussion. That is the basic criteria the writers use. After that the writers tend to select people to give those privileges to whom they respect, even when they disagree.
    You could always ask them – e-mail is in the Contacts page. But you’re probably right. I’m not sure you’d fit the criteria.]

  30. Anita 30

    Lynn, Tane,

    The issue is that The Standard is put forward as a site which speaks on the behalf of the labour movement.

    If it said “we’re some people with some similar views who like to post stuff together” then I’d currently think unkind thoughts about a couple of you because of recent posts, and perhaps I’d think a little less kindly of the rest of you for not publicly pulling up those posters, but that would be all.

    As it is, you say you’re speaking on behalf of the labour movement and you should expect us to say “not in my name!” when you get it wrong.

    If you want to use the strength of the labour movement you need to represent all of us.

  31. Craig Ranapia 31

    Craig, read higher up the thread. The HoS has centralised editorial control. The Standard doesn’t. I wasn’t a fan of ZKM’s post, but then I’m sure he’s not a fan of some of mine. That’s what a diversity of voices is about.

    Still copping out, Tane. A “diversity of voices” doesn’t actually mean “no editorial standards whatsoever” either in the MSM or the blogisphere. And I had the (perhaps naive) hope that Veitch’s vile thuggery, and some of the equally vile commentary around it, wouldn’t be the occasion for quite so transparent partisan hackery.

  32. Tane 32

    Anita, we don’t speak on behalf of the labour movement – we certainly have no mandate to do that. We speak on behalf of ourselves, and our shared values are those that underpin the labour movement.

    Craig, our standards are that we don’t vet each other’s posts before they go up. You can say what you like, my only request is that you direct your purple prose at the poster(s) in question, not at the rest of us.

  33. RedLogix 33

    When someone like Veitch f*cks up so spectacularly as this my first instinct is to keep my mouth shut and to offer up a short private prayer for all those for all those caught up in this madness. Once you reach a certain age, and have had enough things go wrong in your life, the old line “There but for the grace of God go I” gains greater import.

    The facts are not all in. Nothing will excuse the kind of kicking we have read about so far, but without the whole story we have no right to form conclusions, nor much opportunity to learn anything from the sorry episode.

    I am wholly uncomfortable with trying to string this into a partisian story. Yes the world is full of double standards. It is true that if Veitch was brown and from Cannons Creek we would not be hearing calls for redemption from the likes of Boag (and Richard Griffin on an RNZ Panel discussion) just yet. But it is too soon and a step too far to generalise this to the whole of the right wing without a much clearer pattern emerging.

    Veitch will loose his job, and his public life as he currently knows it is over. Yet out of all this, one might hope that someday, something new and cleansed might arise from all of this for him.

  34. higherstandard 34

    RedLogix

    Very sage advice indeed, I agree wholeheartedly.

  35. ZKM dude, This post? What a f*ckn joke. As much as I hate to say it on this issue even Slater hasn’t tried the partisan line. Worse than Whale? You should be ashamed.

  36. Anita 36

    Tane,

    we don’t speak on behalf of the labour movement

    You might want to tweak your Whom – saying that you’re the New Zealand labour movement’s own newspaper digitally reborn sounds a lot like you think you do.

    On the other hand, the labour movement does need this kind of voice in this kind of space. Perhaps aiming to be a collective which does reflect the voice of the labour movement would be the better thing to do.

  37. Craig Ranapia 37

    Craig, our standards are that we don’t vet each other’s posts before they go up. You can say what you like, my only request is that you direct your purple prose at the poster(s) in question, not at the rest of us.

    Tane: Thanks for the critique of my prose style. Perhaps “we” should start, and you might want to be a little less sanctimonious the next time you feel like pissing on David Farrar as the custodian of a “sewer” for the “Kiwiblog right”. Sauce for the goose, and all that.

  38. lprent 38

    Anita: Tane has already covered most of my points at 9:20. However I’d add that I don’t have an opinion on the post.

    I have no idea who Veitch is. I don’t watch very much TV. I also don’t know much about the whatever the fuss is. Probably because I don’t spend much time on NZ media.

    I gather that it is about a domestic assault, which I strongly disapprove of. I’ve heard too many horror stories from my mother who volunteers for a womans refuge. I really disapprove of settling privately in any assault case, it should always go to the police for a criminal determination.

    On the matter of this post. What I looked at was the mechanics. Did the post have a point, did it present an argument, or did it express an opinion? It did – that the case should should have gone to the police and why hasn’t it. Mechanically it was put up as a page rather than a post, which was fixed before I got home.

    After that the writer is on their own. We just moderate the comments.

    I don’t have to agree with the posts, and I regularly don’t with parts or the whole. That would be expected because my personal leanings tend towards the centre (some say centre-right), and most of the posters are far to the ‘left’ of me. If I exerted editorial control, then I’d probably be the only writer and I’m really not that good writing without a compiler.

    The commentators seldom agree fully with the posts either. You can disagree with the post and even attack the posters opinions provided you don’t deteriorate into personal attacks and have point, argument, or opinion that isn’t out of some troll phrasebook.

    The posts are there to provide points of discussion. They aren’t policies. They are the writings of a person which you and I don’t have to agree with.

    BTW: Look at the ‘sods comments to see where the comment boundaries are drawn. The ‘sod has investigated them closely. The one above is a classic.

  39. lprent 39

    craig: I think that kiwiblog’s comment areas are a sewer. Sure there is some good stuff in there. But an awful lot is by the hackneyed troll phrasebook, attacks on other commentators that are purely personal, and the interesting debates get drowned.

    I don’t read there because of that. The noise to signal ratio is appalling. It gets a bit like that here sometimes as well, but we usually moderate out the bad behaviors as soon as possible. But there are more of us doing it, and we’ve done it before our number of comments grew too high.

  40. lprent 40

    Perhaps aiming to be a collective which does reflect the voice of the labour movement would be the better thing to do.

    Exactly. It reflects how the ‘left’ activists from the labour side, green side, and various special interest groups operate in my experience. There is a lot of “agree to disagree” on some things and lets cooperate on what we agree on.

    They should also talk to the ‘right’ for the same reason. In the end we are generally in some kind of agreement on long-term objectives. We disagree on how to get there but there are areas we can and do cooperate in. Forums like this are a place to find out where they are.

    Oops I’d better stop blogging and get ready to head off for the funeral of an old friend.

  41. Tane 41

    Anita, fair point, I hadn’t considered it might give that impression. Feel free to email us any ideas you might have, and if you’re happy to help out then that would be more than welcome too.

  42. If some of the posters judged Michelle as harshly as they do the Standard, then their phoney claims of politicisation might ring true.

    Michelle Boag might have been wearing her PR hat, but that was not why her comments gained attention. How many other PR people have offered their perspective, and why would Michelle speculate that hers might have a wider audience than most?

    Those who defend Veitch deserve to be prison with him.

  43. peanut 43

    The Tony Veitch affair should have been dealt with by the police and his employers at the time of disclosure, not several months down the track.
    TVNZ and RNZ have not shown to be responsible employers at all. But that is typical of this govt and their departments.

    No one should be working 7 days a week and under huge stress. Both employers are scrambling and ducking for cover.

    As for Mallard demanding a report, he is guilty of violent behaviour and was never charged. So any words that come from his lips, should be laughed at.

    I don’t condone Veitch’s behaviour at at all, but the handling of this has been disgraceful.

    At the time his partner entered hospital, the police should have been informed.

    When the Nats get elected, hopefully they can sort out these pathetic govt depts and get some decent accountability.

  44. Matthew Pilott 44

    The Tony Veitch affair should have been dealt with by the police and his employers at the time of disclosure…

    peanut – so under a National Government, employers would be forced to act in case of personal criminal or civil matters, presumably by regulation. mate, that’s some odd fusion of “nanny” and police state, I don’t think you know what National is about at all.

    Seems no one does these days.

    Edit – you are also against doctor-patient confidentiality, by the sound of it. Much as I dislike what I percieve National to stand for, I won’t have you writing such lies about them, I doubt National has any cause to be against one of the central tenents of the health system.

  45. “When the Nats get elected, hopefully they can sort out these pathetic govt depts and get some decent accountability.”

    Sure, because that is exactly what they did last time, when they weren’t selling them off, of course.

  46. Billy 46

    FFS, peanut, how are the police supposed to deal with a crime in the absence of a complaint?

    The really interesting part of this story is the employment law angle. Potentially, we have an employer wanting to sack someone for something unrelated to the performance of his job. Do I expect all you lefties to come screaming to Veitch’s defence if that’s the outcome? Up the workers!

  47. Quoth the Raven 47

    Dean – What about Gerry Brownlee.

  48. Draco TB 48

    Edit – you are also against doctor-patient confidentiality, by the sound of it. Much as I dislike what I percieve National to stand for, I won’t have you writing such lies about them, I doubt National has any cause to be against one of the central tenents of the health system.

    The doctors would have informed the police as, IIRC, it is required for them to do so if there is evidence of assault. The police would then have asked the victim if she wanted to lay a complaint. Exactly what happened when I ended up in hospital after an assault (although that was 20 years ago so the rules may have changed).

    IMO, in this case the Public Interest should have ruled and the police should have investigated and charged whether she wanted to lay a complaint or not. The problem with this is where you draw the line – do you legislate a minimum amount of damage done to the person(s) or do you leave it to police discretion? Of course, now that he’s publicly admitted to the assault the police should charge him.

    Potentially, we have an employer wanting to sack someone for something unrelated to the performance of his job.

    He’s public figure in a broadcast medium so actions like this directly affect his job which is to get an audience. What do you think people are likely to do when they see his face on TV now? Maybe not watch the program anymore? Maybe not watch that channel or even stop watching that broadcaster altogether?

  49. Dean 49

    “Dean – What about Gerry Brownlee.”

    What about him? The article you linked to tells how he had to pay out because of assault charges. Sounds like justice was upheld to me.

    Now, are you going to take off your idealogical hat and admit that violence has been perpetrated by the hands of politicians and/or supporters of all flavours? Or are you going to pretend that a smash in the face is somehow worse when it’s a tory hand delivering it?

  50. Isn’t it so funny that the Mallard Mauler can’t get answers from TVNZ. Give em an upper cut clever trevor, winny will say it didn’t happen.

  51. “lprent: The Standard is a program running on a machine.”

    That’s how it seems sometimes. Perhaps that’s why you’ve tried to shoehorn a tragic story about intimate violence into an attack on the National Party.

    [lprent: Huh? I haven’t written any such post. Oh I see. This is a variant of the pig-fucker technique that the ‘sod loves so dearly.

    Take a 2 week ban for incorrectly attributing this post to my authorship. If you wish to argue in public then I’ll make it longer or even permanent. Contemplate the wisdom of annoying a sysop in their domain.]

  52. Billy 52

    He’s public figure in a broadcast medium so actions like this directly affect his job which is to get an audience.

    Then, Draco, you’d better get ready for the taxpayer to write little Tony a big cheque. Because that’s looking like the only way they’re going to get rid of him, given that they knew and took no action seven months ago.

    Will that sit well with you guys looking for stronger “work rights”?

  53. Tane 53

    George, how’s Lynn done that? Surely you’ve read the thread above.

  54. Quoth the Raven 54

    Dean – Of course I’ll admit it and I’m none too concrened about it. I merely brought it up because you mentioned some labour activist in the same manner as you’re now decrying.

  55. Lew 55

    Billy: “Will that sit well with you guys looking for stronger “work rights’?”

    Yep. If Veitch’s known actions are deemed to have been sufficient to trigger whatever `disrepute’ provisions are in his contract, then they should have been exercised then – if by failing to act then people neutered TVNZ’s ability to enforce those provisions now, then the fault for lies squarely on them. (And this is over and above any moral or ethical opprobrium due them for protecting a wife-beater, if they had reasonable cause to believe he was one).

    What was Veitch to do – terminate his contract absent his employer’s insistence? Perhaps – but he can’t be blamed for not doing so when it was his employer’s contract to enforce.

    L

  56. QoT 56

    Guys, I hate to derail the conversation further, but I have to side with Anita here.

    It is incredibly disingenuous to talk about “lack of centralised editorial control” and “independent posters”. At the end of the day, The Standard isn’t just a happy agglomeration of random individuals.

    I have previously tried to explain it thus: when a post is made, I don’t think of it as “a Steve Pierson post which just happens to be on The Standard”. It is, at the very least, representative of what a post on The Standard should look like, and the issues which The Standard as a whole wish to address.

    So when the only posts on The Standard to do with the Tony Veitch affair are a) a springboard into “John Key sucks Part MMXVIII” and b) a springboard into “National and the Sensible Sentencing Trust suck” … well, then readers of The Standard are going to think, right, The Standard is treating this issue as one of how much National/John Key sucks.

    I get that individual writers here aren’t a hive mind and don’t agree on every detail of every issue. I get that it adds a lot of responsibility to say, “As writer X on The Standard, my views are going to be inherently linked to writer Y’s, and as a blog we are collectively seen to represent Z”. I get that there’s no big kahuna making the rules and setting the agenda. But The Standard is still a brand, and you have to acknowledge that your individual, autonomous posts are taken by readers as indicative of what The Standard brand represents.

    Example: when the Tony Veitch issue was newly broken, and no one had yet covered it on The Hand Mirror, one of that blog’s writers noticed and decided to remedy it; because The Hand Mirror is the kind of blog that *should* be commenting on that issue.*

    *stargazer is welcome to tell me to stfu.

  57. Lily 57

    Tony veitch is lucky he is a white celebrity, and is married to a millionaires daughter and after all the evidence has been disclosed, he still has Paul Holmes willing to give him a character reference. I know that if he was the normal Joe Blow on the street , part maori, tattoos and this same situation had occurred Paul Holmes and Tony Veitch would be asking for him to put behind bars. Some may say oh but he paid her hush money???? 100 k hardly enough for breaking her back in 4 places and even then she had to beg for the payment ? loss of earnings. hospital bills in America he would expect to pay over a million dollars or more for 7 counts of assault and breaking her back. So Mr Veitch still sleeping with your wife?. with a jury to decide your fate is not what other countries would give you. Like rape laws Mr Veitch you had no right to assault her there are other ways to deal with conflict breaking her back is not one of them. You may fool some people, but not me or my contemporaries. Tony I have worked with rapists and violent men in prison you are no different to them you are a man filled with rage behind that smile?. you need help and a spell in prison would not hurt you at all.
    You should pay dearly for how you treated Kristin, the same law that applies to that every day Maori/ European on the street Mr Veitch should in all fairness apply to you.

    Lets hope that the rights of woman can be upheld in our courts .. Zoe well she can say all she likes she is not the one with a broken back ala Tony if she was she would be having her day in court as well ? the stalking issues Tony could have reported her to the police like any other citizens would have. The size of the hush money is laughable in my opinion.

    Good luck Kristin all power to You 🙂

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • EV road user charges bill passes
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the passing of legislation to move light electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) into the road user charges system from 1 April.  “It was always intended that EVs and PHEVs would be exempt from road user charges until they reached two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Bill targets illegal, unregulated fishing in international waters
    New Zealand is strengthening its ability to combat illegal fishing outside its domestic waters and beef up regulation for its own commercial fishers in international waters through a Bill which had its first reading in Parliament today. The Fisheries (International Fishing and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2023 sets out stronger ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Reserve Bank appointments
    Economists Carl Hansen and Professor Prasanna Gai have been appointed to the Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Committee, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced today. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is the independent decision-making body that sets the Official Cash Rate which determines interest rates.  Carl Hansen, the executive director of Capital ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Stronger protections for apartment owners
    Apartment owners and buyers will soon have greater protections as further changes to the law on unit titles come into effect, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Unit Titles (Strengthening Body Corporate Governance and Other Matters) Amendment Act had already introduced some changes in December 2022 and May 2023, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • Travel focused on traditional partners and Middle East
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Egypt and Europe from this weekend.    “This travel will focus on a range of New Zealand’s traditional diplomatic and security partnerships while enabling broad engagement on the urgent situation in Gaza,” Mr Peters says.   Mr Peters will attend the NATO Foreign ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • Keep safe on our roads this Easter
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown is encouraging all road users to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. “Road safety is a responsibility we all share, and with increased traffic on our roads expected this Easter we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • Cost of living support for over 1.4 million Kiwis
    About 1.4 million New Zealanders will receive cost of living relief through increased government assistance from April 1 909,000 pensioners get a boost to Superannuation, including 5000 veterans 371,000 working-age beneficiaries will get higher payments 45,000 students will see an increase in their allowance Over a quarter of New Zealanders ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Tenancy reviews for social housing restart
    Ensuring social housing is being provided to those with the greatest needs is front of mind as the Government restarts social housing tenancy reviews, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. “Our relentless focus on building a strong economy is to ensure we can deliver better public services such as social ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary plan halted
    The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary will not go ahead, with Cabinet deciding to stop work on the proposed reserve and remove the Bill that would have established it from Parliament’s order paper. “The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary Bill would have created a 620,000 sq km economic no-go zone,” Oceans and Fisheries Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Cutting all that dam red tape
    Dam safety regulations are being amended so that smaller dams won’t be subject to excessive compliance costs, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on reducing costs and removing unnecessary red tape so we can get the economy back on track.  “Dam safety regulations ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    13 hours ago
  • Drought support extended to parts of North Island
    The coalition Government is expanding the medium-scale adverse event classification to parts of the North Island as dry weather conditions persist, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I have made the decision to expand the medium-scale adverse event classification already in place for parts of the South Island to also cover the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • Passage of major tax bill welcomed
    The passing of legislation giving effect to coalition Government tax commitments has been welcomed by Finance Minister Nicola Willis.  “The Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill will help place New Zealand on a more secure economic footing, improve outcomes for New Zealanders, and make our tax system ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Lifting economy through science, tertiary sectors
    Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins and Tertiary Education and Skills Minister Penny Simmonds today announced plans to transform our science and university sectors to boost the economy. Two advisory groups, chaired by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, will advise the Government on how these sectors can play a greater ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government announces Budget priorities
    The Budget will deliver urgently-needed tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders while putting the government’s finances back on a sustainable track, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  The Finance Minister made the comments at the release of the Budget Policy Statement setting out the Government’s Budget objectives. “The coalition Government intends ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government to consider accommodation solution
    The coalition Government will look at options to address a zoning issue that limits how much financial support Queenstown residents can get for accommodation. Cabinet has agreed on a response to the Petitions Committee, which had recommended the geographic information MSD uses to determine how much accommodation supplement can be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government approves extension to Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care
    Cabinet has agreed to a short extension to the final reporting timeframe for the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care from 28 March 2024 to 26 June 2024, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden says.                                         “The Royal Commission wrote to me on 16 February 2024, requesting that I consider an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • $18m boost for Kiwis travelling to health treatment
    The coalition Government is delivering an $18 million boost to New Zealanders needing to travel for specialist health treatment, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says.   “These changes are long overdue – the National Travel Assistance (NTA) scheme saw its last increase to mileage and accommodation rates way back in 2009.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • PM’s Prizes for Space to showcase sector’s talent
    The Government is recognising the innovative and rising talent in New Zealand’s growing space sector, with the Prime Minister and Space Minister Judith Collins announcing the new Prime Minister’s Prizes for Space today. “New Zealand has a growing reputation as a high-value partner for space missions and research. I am ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Concerns conveyed to China over cyber activity
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government.     “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity, attributed to groups sponsored by the Chinese Government, targeting democratic institutions in both New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry
    Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry Education Minister Erica Stanford today announced the appointment of three independent reviewers to lead the Ministerial Inquiry into the Ministry of Education’s School Property Function.  The Inquiry will be led by former Minister of Foreign Affairs Murray McCully. “There is a clear need ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Brynderwyns open for Easter
    State Highway 1 across the Brynderwyns will be open for Easter weekend, with work currently underway to ensure the resilience of this critical route being paused for Easter Weekend to allow holiday makers to travel north, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Today I visited the Brynderwyn Hills construction site, where ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Speech to the Infrastructure Funding & Financing Conference
    Introduction Good morning to you all, and thanks for having me bright and early today. I am absolutely delighted to be the Minister for Infrastructure alongside the Minister of Housing and Resource Management Reform. I know the Prime Minister sees the three roles as closely connected and he wants me ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Parliamentary network breached by the PRC
    New Zealand stands with the United Kingdom in its condemnation of People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-backed malicious cyber activity impacting its Electoral Commission and targeting Members of the UK Parliament. “The use of cyber-enabled espionage operations to interfere with democratic institutions and processes anywhere is unacceptable,” Minister Responsible for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ to provide support for Solomon Islands election
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins today announced New Zealand will provide logistics support for the upcoming Solomon Islands election. “We’re sending a team of New Zealand Defence Force personnel and two NH90 helicopters to provide logistics support for the election on 17 April, at the request ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ-EU FTA gains Royal Assent for 1 May entry to force
    The European Union Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill received Royal Assent today, completing the process for New Zealand’s ratification of its free trade agreement with the European Union.    “I am pleased to announce that today, in a small ceremony at the Beehive, New Zealand notified the European Union ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • COVID-19 inquiry attracts 11,000 submissions
    Public consultation on the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into COVID-19 Lessons has concluded, Internal Affairs Minister Hon Brooke van Velden says.  “I have been advised that there were over 11,000 submissions made through the Royal Commission’s online consultation portal.” Expanding the scope of the Royal Commission of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Families to receive up to $75 a week help with ECE fees
    Hardworking families are set to benefit from a new credit to help them meet their early childcare education (ECE) costs, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. From 1 July, parents and caregivers of young children will be supported to manage the rising cost of living with a partial reimbursement of their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Unlocking a sustainable, low-emissions future
    A specialised Independent Technical Advisory Group (ITAG) tasked with preparing and publishing independent non-binding advice on the design of a "green" (sustainable finance) taxonomy rulebook is being established, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says.  “Comprising experts and market participants, the ITAG's primary goal is to deliver comprehensive recommendations to the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Chief of Army thanked for his service
    Defence Minister Judith Collins has thanked the Chief of Army, Major General John Boswell, DSD, for his service as he leaves the Army after 40 years. “I would like to thank Major General Boswell for his contribution to the Army and the wider New Zealand Defence Force, undertaking many different ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders
    25 March 2024 Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders Small Business, Manufacturing, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly will travel to Australia for a series of bi-lateral meetings and manufacturing visits. During the visit, Minister Bayly will meet with his Australian counterparts, Senator Tim Ayres, Ed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government commits nearly $3 million for period products in schools
    Government commits almost $3 million for period products in schools The Coalition Government has committed $2.9 million to ensure intermediate and secondary schools continue providing period products to those who need them, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “This is an issue of dignity and ensuring young women don’t ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech – Making it easier to build.
    Good morning, it’s great to be here.   First, I would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of Building Surveyors and thank you for the opportunity to be here this morning.  I would like to use this opportunity to outline the Government’s ambitious plan and what we hope to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pacific youth to shine from boost to Polyfest
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti has announced the Government’s commitment to the Auckland Secondary Schools Māori and Pacific Islands Cultural Festival, more commonly known as Polyfest. “The Ministry for Pacific Peoples is a longtime supporter of Polyfest and, as it celebrates 49 years in 2024, I’m proud to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • 2024 Ngarimu VC and 28th (Māori) Battalion Memorial Scholarships announced
    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to Breast Cancer Foundation – Insights Conference
    Before moving onto the substance of today’s address, I want to recognise the very significant and ongoing contribution the Breast Cancer Foundation makes to support the lives of New Zealand women and their families living with breast cancer. I very much enjoy working with you. I also want to recognise ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Kiwi research soars to International Space Station
    New Zealand has notched up a first with the launch of University of Canterbury research to the International Space Station, Science, Innovation and Technology and Space Minister Judith Collins says. The hardware, developed by Dr Sarah Kessans, is designed to operate autonomously in orbit, allowing scientists on Earth to study ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Planning Institute
    Introduction Thank you for inviting me to speak with you today and I’m sorry I can’t be there in person. Yesterday I started in Wellington for Breakfast TV, spoke to a property conference in Auckland, and finished the day speaking to local government in Christchurch, so it would have been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Support for Northland emergency response centre
    The Coalition Government is contributing more than $1 million to support the establishment of an emergency multi-agency coordination centre in Northland. Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell announced the contribution today during a visit of the Whangārei site where the facility will be constructed.  “Northland has faced a number ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Celebrating 20 years of Whakaata Māori
    New Zealanders have enjoyed a broader range of voices telling the story of Aotearoa thanks to the creation of Whakaata Māori 20 years ago, says Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The minister spoke at a celebration marking the national indigenous media organisation’s 20th anniversary at their studio in Auckland on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Some commercial fishery catch limits increased
    Commercial catch limits for some fisheries have been increased following a review showing stocks are healthy and abundant, Ocean and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The changes, along with some other catch limit changes and management settings, begin coming into effect from 1 April 2024. "Regular biannual reviews of fish ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-03-28T08:57:52+00:00